


The term “祖國 Ancestral Land” often refers to the People’s Republic of China governed by the Chinese Communist Party within Taiwan’s historical and contemporary context. However, the term originates from Western concepts such as homeland—terms like fatherland, motherland, pátria, or patria. In early East Asian and Taiwanese history, the idea of a “nation-state” or nationalist identity as we know it today did not actually exist. At the time, when people left their hometowns to build new lives elsewhere, their longing was more for “home” or “hometown,” or what is called “祖家 Ancestral Home” (chó͘-ke) in Taiwanese (Zhangzhou dialect).
To clarify this historical context, we must revisit the history of East Asia and Taiwan. By examining the movement of maritime communities during that period, we explore how diverse ethnic groups interacted across the seas. An extraordinary number of people traversed the ocean: From the first Portuguese arrivals to other Western powers, how did they engage with the local populations in East Asia? On a small island like Taiwan, how many untold stories and hidden footprints remain?
Through a deeper investigation into the ocean, language, and culture, we will re-examine East Asia’s international dynamics and see how Taiwan, as a small island inhabited by ordinary people, was swept into the turbulent currents of global history. Let’s re-evaluate the debates on Taiwanese subjectivity and national identity—and open new directions for dialogue and understanding.
Kaim Ang was born and raised in Changhua, and is currently a research fellow emeritus at the Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica. His areas of expertise include 16th–18th century Taiwanese history, East Asian history, historical theory, and historical folklore. Even after retirement, he continues to apply his historical methodology in everyday life.
Between Mountains and Seas: Treatises on the Early Taiwan History in the Early Modern Period is a culmination of many years of scholarship. In this work, Ang underscores the importance of textual analysis and the study of long-term historical structures. He approaches the 16th–18th centuries East and Southeast Asia through a Taiwanese lens, intentionally avoiding periodisation and instead emphasizing continuity and structural analysis.
He advocates for “the cultural field of the Hoklo people” as a framework for understanding early modern history, reaffirming the importance of classical historical inquiry in rethinking early modern maritime East Asia and Taiwanese history. Through a combination of rigorous textual interpretation and broad historical perspectives, Ang examines multiple case studies—historical toponymy, popular religion, and Chinese diaspora in Southeast Asia. He frames the diversity and richness of Taiwan’s history through three main lenses: Dutch archival and Indigenous studies; place names and natural/marine resources; and folk legends and maritime beliefs.
「祖國」這個看似清晰的概念,在台灣的歷史與現實語境中,常特指由共產黨統治的中華人民共和國。然而,「祖國」一詞源於西方「homeland」(如fatherland、motherland、pátria、patria)的概念。在早期的東亞與台灣歷史中,這種「國族國家」的概念其實並不存在。當時,人們離鄉背井、建立新家園時,更多的思念是關於「家」、「故鄉」,或台語(漳州語)所稱的「祖家」(chó͘-ke)。
為了釐清這段歷史脈絡,我們將回溯至近代初期的東亞與台灣歷史。從當時海上人群的頻繁活動中,探究多元族群如何往來互動。當時,超乎想像的人群在海上航行,留下豐富的歷史痕跡。從最早抵達的葡萄牙人,到其他西方勢力,他們如何與東亞在地居民互動?在「台灣」這樣一個小小的東亞島嶼上,究竟能承載多少不為人知的足跡?
透過對海洋、語言與文化的深入探索,我們將重新審視東亞的國際局勢,看台灣如何從小島小民,捲入世界的歷史漩渦。最終,這一切都將引導我們重新檢討「台灣」主體性與國族再認同的紛爭根源,並開啟新的論述方向。
翁佳音,彰化二水人。中央研究院台灣史研究所兼任研究員,研究專長為十六至十八世紀臺灣史、東亞史,史學理論、歷史民俗學。目前進行退休生活的歷史實踐。
《近代初期臺灣的海與事》為翁佳音長久以來主張的結果。他強調文獻考證與觀察歷史長期結構的研究方法論,以臺灣的視角看近代初期(十六到十八世紀)的臺灣,以及她身處的東亞 • 東南亞歷史,避免以斷代史角度論述,強調「連續性」與「結構性」。
翁佳音強調「大福佬文化圈」的研究視角,與古典歷史學的重要性,以此重新討論近代初期東亞海洋史與臺灣史。注重歷史文獻考訂與宏觀歷史解釋,並進一步透過歷史地名學、民俗宗教學及東南亞華人移民史等多重個案,從「荷蘭文獻與原住民史研究」、「歷史地名學與海陸物產研究」與「民間傳說與海洋宗教」三個層面探討台灣史的多元性與豐富性。
TAIWANfest Toronto is grateful to be held on the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territories of many nations, including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples, that is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. We acknowledge our privilege to be gathered here, and commit to work with and be respectful to the Indigenous peoples of this land while we engage in meaningful conversations of culture and reconciliation.